Question: What's Enlightenment?
Thanks for wondering the questions that can come to your brain, even though they seem "rather peculiar" to you. In Enlightenment all observed suffering has vanished, for what but wrong-mindedness seemed to make the misperception called pain.
Suffering was the illusion that Christ could keep a Loving Creator's Mind. "If pain is true there is no God. If God is true there's acim no pain."(W-190.3) The latter is true since God does not have any opposite. Enlightenment entails number pain or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Pure, Continuous Pleasure, Peace, Flexibility, and Joy. Being Regular, Enlightenment understands perhaps not of change. The dream of weakness and changing emotions went as well. There's no pride to drop "back into." Spirit Abides in delicate Love. All suffering is over Today and nothing remains but a benefit of Stillness.
The Sacred Soul could be the reminder that Living is Eternal. The Provide Moment is the gateway to Eternity. The planet of photographs was a world of illusion. Photographs are thus simple to the Holy Spirit. These were "neutralized" the instant they did actually arise.
What does this mean with regards to your second question? You can't destroy what has never lived, and in the Holy Spirit's Perception of forgiveness damage is impossible. Figures were never born and never die because the world of photos could be the past. It is impossible to get beginnings and endings in a software that's currently prepared and over long ago. There's no living in images. Here is the meaning of "Hold no graven photos before the Lord Thy God." All images were built to unknown the Truth from recognition, and they are able to just be understood as you illusion. If illusions might be separated up into living and lifeless, natural and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment could be impossible. For what is Enlightenment but Pure Oneness, far beyond the likelihood of department of any kind? The split mind was the illusion. Seek never to project the split brain to forms and contact some types living and some forms dead. Lord understands perhaps not form. The separate mind appeared to be the "killer" illusion, the Sacred Soul tells the resting brain that what is full and specific cannot BE split. In Paradise Brain is One Heart, and also pertaining to this world forgiveness shows that Oneness. The forgiven earth recognizes the unity of the relieved mind and sees that there surely is nothing "outside" of the single brain which dreams gently a pleased, delicate dream. The goal of ACIM is to dream softly of a sinless world. This purpose is significantly more than probable, it's expected!
In terms of my seeming diet, "eat what is served" could be the Guidance I was handed from the Sacred Heart many years ago. Join with your brother and allow number idea come involving the Love you share. This Guidance hasn't changed. "Dinner" is always a history for discussing the Pleasure of the Residing Moment. What the planet calls "breathing" and "eating" and "drinking" and "sleeping" are actually all the same in the Enlightened State. The Relieved Perspective considers the sameness of things because they all share the exact same Purpose: forgiveness. That Perception isn't "particular," for in good understanding nothing is personal. God is no respecter of persons. I practically can't "take" an animal's "life" since Living is Soul and can only just be prolonged or Given as God Gives. "Take" does not have any meaning in my own brain and since animals have never "lived" it's difficult that they could "die." The opinion expressed in thinking "privately take an animal's life" has many main assumptions which are false. In right-mindedness it is clear that ideas are increased as they are given out or discussed, and "taking" a "life" or anything at all doesn't have meaning. All that I give is directed at mySelf, and in offering there's number loss, number lose, and nothing is actually recinded from wholeness and unity. The teacher of Lord does not want something that can not be provided away. Such may be the Delight of wonders! The idea vegetables be seemingly flung everywhere, yet there is never a good glance back again to see where in fact the vegetables land. The seeds are never for an "different," and because giving and obtaining are the same the mind gets the gifts it gives. This is truly the feast you find for within the ego's questions.
The sole problem that need be requested is a problem that's not necessarily silly at all: Am I ready to understand that God's May and My Possess will be the Same? God's Can for Me is for Great Happiness. And what but that Can is the Can of Christ? Joyfully, nothing can alter Eternal Love. Thank You Lord!
Thanks for wondering the questions that can come to your brain, even though they seem "rather peculiar" to you. In Enlightenment all observed suffering has vanished, for what but wrong-mindedness seemed to make the misperception called pain.
Suffering was the illusion that Christ could keep a Loving Creator's Mind. "If pain is true there is no God. If God is true there's acim no pain."(W-190.3) The latter is true since God does not have any opposite. Enlightenment entails number pain or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Pure, Continuous Pleasure, Peace, Flexibility, and Joy. Being Regular, Enlightenment understands perhaps not of change. The dream of weakness and changing emotions went as well. There's no pride to drop "back into." Spirit Abides in delicate Love. All suffering is over Today and nothing remains but a benefit of Stillness.
The Sacred Soul could be the reminder that Living is Eternal. The Provide Moment is the gateway to Eternity. The planet of photographs was a world of illusion. Photographs are thus simple to the Holy Spirit. These were "neutralized" the instant they did actually arise.
What does this mean with regards to your second question? You can't destroy what has never lived, and in the Holy Spirit's Perception of forgiveness damage is impossible. Figures were never born and never die because the world of photos could be the past. It is impossible to get beginnings and endings in a software that's currently prepared and over long ago. There's no living in images. Here is the meaning of "Hold no graven photos before the Lord Thy God." All images were built to unknown the Truth from recognition, and they are able to just be understood as you illusion. If illusions might be separated up into living and lifeless, natural and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment could be impossible. For what is Enlightenment but Pure Oneness, far beyond the likelihood of department of any kind? The split mind was the illusion. Seek never to project the split brain to forms and contact some types living and some forms dead. Lord understands perhaps not form. The separate mind appeared to be the "killer" illusion, the Sacred Soul tells the resting brain that what is full and specific cannot BE split. In Paradise Brain is One Heart, and also pertaining to this world forgiveness shows that Oneness. The forgiven earth recognizes the unity of the relieved mind and sees that there surely is nothing "outside" of the single brain which dreams gently a pleased, delicate dream. The goal of ACIM is to dream softly of a sinless world. This purpose is significantly more than probable, it's expected!
In terms of my seeming diet, "eat what is served" could be the Guidance I was handed from the Sacred Heart many years ago. Join with your brother and allow number idea come involving the Love you share. This Guidance hasn't changed. "Dinner" is always a history for discussing the Pleasure of the Residing Moment. What the planet calls "breathing" and "eating" and "drinking" and "sleeping" are actually all the same in the Enlightened State. The Relieved Perspective considers the sameness of things because they all share the exact same Purpose: forgiveness. That Perception isn't "particular," for in good understanding nothing is personal. God is no respecter of persons. I practically can't "take" an animal's "life" since Living is Soul and can only just be prolonged or Given as God Gives. "Take" does not have any meaning in my own brain and since animals have never "lived" it's difficult that they could "die." The opinion expressed in thinking "privately take an animal's life" has many main assumptions which are false. In right-mindedness it is clear that ideas are increased as they are given out or discussed, and "taking" a "life" or anything at all doesn't have meaning. All that I give is directed at mySelf, and in offering there's number loss, number lose, and nothing is actually recinded from wholeness and unity. The teacher of Lord does not want something that can not be provided away. Such may be the Delight of wonders! The idea vegetables be seemingly flung everywhere, yet there is never a good glance back again to see where in fact the vegetables land. The seeds are never for an "different," and because giving and obtaining are the same the mind gets the gifts it gives. This is truly the feast you find for within the ego's questions.
The sole problem that need be requested is a problem that's not necessarily silly at all: Am I ready to understand that God's May and My Possess will be the Same? God's Can for Me is for Great Happiness. And what but that Can is the Can of Christ? Joyfully, nothing can alter Eternal Love. Thank You Lord!
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek